Show employers the courses and projects your students actually did, not just a branch and a CGPA. Proof of the courses and projects your students actually did.

ReadyHo

What runs at your college

Someone who does the job for a living checks the work

Your teacher sets the mark. Then a working professional from industry reads the same work and puts their name on it. That is the part an employer believes.

Why it matters

Why this matters to your placement office

A college that marks its own students and publishes the result is talking about itself. Employers know that, so they test every candidate again from scratch.

Now add a named professional in that industry who read the same work and signed it. The employer is not taking your word any more. They are taking the word of someone in their own field.

That is the difference between a claim and a reference.

The steps

What the professional actually does

  1. Your teacher finishes marking first. The professional never opens an unmarked pile.
  2. Your teacher emails them an invitation. It names the specific pieces of work, not the whole system.
  3. They set up their own account. They say what they do, where, how long they have practised, and any registration they hold.
  4. They open only the work they were asked to read. Nothing else on your installation.
  5. They score the same scorecard your teacher wrote, and write a few lines of feedback.
  6. Their name and their comments go on the student's record.

Three readings, one scorecard. The first draft score, your teacher's mark and the professional's score sit side by side on the record. Nothing is averaged and nothing is hidden.

Who counts

You decide who counts as a professional

There is no approved list, and the software has no view on which jobs qualify. Your faculty invite people they already know and rate.

An architect on a housing scheme. A lawyer on a contract. A journalist on a filed story. A teacher on a lesson plan.

The software does not know what subject it is being used for. Your department writes the scorecard, so the same screen works for any course you teach.

Most departments already do a version of this. The jury at the end of a studio project. The visiting examiner at a viva. The client panel at the end of term. That input is real, and today it is spoken out loud and gone by the evening. This gives it somewhere to land.

Professional review, 2 of 3 Illustrative
Reviewing as
Meera Kulkarni, principal architect, Kulkarni and Rao, Pune. Fourteen years in practice. Council of Architecture registration stated.
Scorecard, site response and material logic
Site analysis and constraints 4 / 5
Structural and material logic 3 / 5
Written feedback
The section carries the idea further than the plan does. I would ask for the parapet junction to be resolved before this goes to a client.
Submit review
What an invited professional sees. This example is an architecture project. The screen is the same in any subject, because the criteria are whatever your teacher wrote. The account reaches those three pieces of work and nothing else.

Every review carries a real name

Shared department logins for outside reviewers are not supported. That is a rule, not a setting an administrator can change.

An anonymous check is worth nothing to an employer. If no name is on it, it reads as the college marking itself twice, in different words.

The cost is real and we accepted it. Every professional has to accept an invitation and set up an account. That is slower than passing one password around a staff room.

Access

What an invited reviewer can and cannot see

What an invited professional's account can and cannot reach.
They can open They cannot open
The brief and the scorecard the work is marked against Any work they were not asked to read
Only the pieces of work named in their invitation Any other student, class, course or department
A box for their own scores and written feedback Your settings, staff accounts and admin

Access is given one invitation at a time. A reviewer with no live invitation has an account that opens onto nothing.

Limits

What we do not do

There is no directory, no matching service, and no payment through the software. Whatever you agree with a professional, paid or unpaid, stays between you.

Credentials go on the record as the professional states them. We do not ring the bar council to check. The record says stated credentials, and means it.

This step assumes you already know professionals in the subjects you teach. If a department does not, that is the hard part, and no software fixes it. Sort that out before you install anything.

Next step

Get started

ReadyHo is free and open source. Start with one course, or run it across your departments.

Get started See how it works

What it takes to run this on your own servers

The rest of what runs at your college

  • Set the work Your teacher writes the project and a simple scorecard once, then reuses both every year.
  • Collect the work Send a project to one student, a group, or a whole year. The actual work comes back in one place.
  • First draft scores Every submission comes back scored against your scorecard, with comments. No student ever sees this part.
  • Your teacher decides Your teacher sees the work and the draft side by side, changes anything they disagree with, and sets the mark.
  • The proof The work, the scorecard, all three opinions, and who gave each one. One page an employer can open.
  • Student control Nothing is published unless the student says so, and they can change their mind at any time.
  • Cost control You hold the account, pick what it uses, and set a spending limit. Nothing is billed through us.
  • Your servers One install on your own machine. Student work, drafts and marks never leave your college.