Give employers proof of what your students can do
Your students do real courses and projects. Your teachers mark the work, and a working professional from industry checks it and signs it. What comes out is a page an employer can open, so a shortlist is cut on what a student did rather than on the branch and the CGPA.
Recruiters see the work before the first interview
A marksheet says a student turned up and passed. It does not say whether they can draft a lease, plan a site survey, or run a shift handover.
So recruiters test your graduates all over again. That costs them time, and it costs your students offers.
A ReadyHo record answers the question up front. It holds:
- The brief the student was given, and the scorecard it was marked against
- The work the student actually handed in
- Three scores on that work: a first draft from the software, your teacher's mark, and a professional's check
- The professional's name and where they work
- Your college's confirmation, and a link back to your own copy
An employer opens it with no account and no phone call to your placement office.
Placement is the admissions argument
Admissions follow placement. Placement follows what employers believe about your graduates.
A placement brochure is your claim about yourself. A record carries a name that is not on your payroll, and anyone can check it without asking you.
Build to what employers hire for, and carry it through to the offer
You already read what employers want and shape courses and projects around it. Today that signal stops at a marksheet.
A department watches the market, adds a course, and sets projects that build the capability. Students do the work. Then hiring reduces it to a branch and a CGPA, and a strong student in the wrong branch is filtered out before anyone reads what they made.
ReadyHo keeps the loop intact. Each course and project becomes a checkable record, so you showcase the actual work when employers hire. A metallurgy student who built machine learning projects is considered for the machine learning role on the strength of those projects, rather than screened out by the branch on the degree.
It works for any subject you teach
The software does not know or care what subject it is marking. Your teacher writes the scorecard: what is being marked, and what good work looks like at each level.
We publish free scorecards to start from, in law, architecture, and design. Adapt them, or write your own.
One teacher runs it, and the rest of the department carries on
The work falls on one teacher, mostly in the first semester.
What that teacher does
- Writes the brief and the scorecard once, then reuses them next semester
- Reads the draft scores. Straightforward ones can be accepted in bulk
- Invites one professional they already know: an alumnus, a visiting faculty member, someone from the advisory board
- Approves everything. Nothing reaches a student, and nothing is published, until they say so
What does not change
- Your curriculum. The project is whatever that teacher already sets
- Your learning management system. It stays where it is, and there is nothing to migrate
- Your admissions, fees, and exams. ReadyHo does not touch them
- Your students' routine. They hand in work and read the feedback. No new tool to learn
- Your professional network. You invite people you already know. We do not supply, vet, or pay them
Your teacher always has the last word
The software writes a first draft score in minutes, with comments tied to specific lines in the student's work. Your teacher can change any score, replace it, or accept it as it stands. Every change carries their name, and so does every professional's sign off.
No licence fee, and no invoice from us
You install it on your own servers. You pay your AI provider and your hosting provider directly. Nothing is billed by ReadyHo.
200 to 700 rupees per student per year
| Where the money goes | Cost per student per year |
|---|---|
| Marking by software, about ten submissions | 70 to 400 rupees |
| Hosting and servers | 100 to 300 rupees |
| ReadyHo licence | Nothing. There is none |
| The public record pages | Nothing, for colleges, students, and employers |
A commercial platform doing comparable work runs to roughly 1,800 to 3,000 rupees per student per year. That comes from published Indian education pricing rather than vendor quotes.
It is yours, and it stays yours
-
The servers
One modest machine covers your first few hundred students. Around half a day of one IT person to set up.
-
The AI account
Your provider, your choice of models, your monthly spending limit. You can run models on your own hardware instead, with no change to the software.
-
The software
Free to use, and yours to keep. Change it, or hire anyone you like to support it. The scorecards are free to reuse with credit.
-
The data
Submitted work, drafts, comments, marks, and every student who said no all stay on your servers. Only finished, approved records for consenting students are ever published.
The offer
Get started, and roll it out across the college
Begin with one course or a whole programme, and grow it across departments. At the end of the term you hold assessed records a recruiter can check.
What you provide
- A course, or a whole programme, that already sets project work
- A teacher to set the project, write the scorecard, and review the drafts
- A professional from your own network
- An IT person for half a day, or a cloud instance
- A decision on student consent, made with whoever handles data protection
What you get
- The software, free to use and yours to keep, plus the published scorecards
- Setup instructions, and configuration for your own AI account and spending limit
- The whole loop: set the project, students submit, a first draft score, your teacher's mark, a professional's check, and publication only if the student agrees
- Real numbers: teacher minutes in weeks one to four, and how closely the draft scores matched your professional's judgment
What it costs you
It is free and open source. The installation is yours under the licence and keeps working whether you continue or not. No record is published without that student's consent.
How to start
Send one email naming the course or programme and the teacher who would run it. You will get back what setup needs and what the first month looks like.